tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-663998076511109850.post5524979199101646544..comments2011-11-01T02:09:57.311-07:00Marcfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07557608193924044365noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-663998076511109850.post-85077845168744247092011-11-01T02:09:57.311-07:002011-11-01T02:09:57.311-07:00because that one hurts my brain real bad. Things happening before their cause. You writing the comment before the blog etc etc, it doesn&#39;t mean anything.Marcfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07557608193924044365noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-663998076511109850.post-75772094822233782322011-11-01T01:41:53.189-07:002011-11-01T01:41:53.189-07:00Why not sacrifice causality?Dan B.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-663998076511109850.post-87383196884411559012011-10-11T13:15:20.791-07:002011-10-11T13:15:20.791-07:00I hereby declare the multiverse meme absolute nonsense.Marcfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07557608193924044365noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-663998076511109850.post-6931775250059823422011-10-11T13:08:23.927-07:002011-10-11T13:08:23.927-07:00Marc,<br /><br />Will sacrificing 2/ get rid of the idea of every event (call it E1) having parallel events that come about as a result of alternate possibilities of E1? <br /><br />To be a little more concrete, let&#39;s say you have E1 being a man being hit by a car. E2 is him not being hit by the car. Each event is a possibility with its own set of causal events growing out of them.<br /><br />This concept has always given me a headache. It&#39;s like an infinitely expanding graph of event nodes.Bill Pynehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12540701365860271621noreply@blogger.com